i know it's of finding these issues yet? have read longer charging times rest little surprising.
in other types of tests conducted various tech publications, new ipad consistently performs more poorly ipad 2. anandtech, instance, found new ipad draws 4.58 watts while surfing web on wi-fi while ipad 2 draws mere 2.48 watts. displaymate found new ipad @ maximum brightness sitting idle draws 7.32 watts. ipad 2? 3.47 watts. cnet found ipad 2 draws 1.76 watts @ 150 candelas per square meter (cd/m2) brightness 720p video playback. new ipad draws 3.32 watts. these results show there approximately doubling of power consumption, yet new ipad's battery increased in size 70%, 25 watt hours 42.5 watt hours.
new ipad's ultra-high-rez push seems run counter apple's form-over-function design philosophy. bleeding-edge screen has inflicted tradeoffs in usability: thicker , heavier chassis, longer charge times, hotter surface temperatures, , shorter battery life. photographers crave higher resolution , higher color gamut, new ipad must have. else craving ipad, decision more difficult.
if can't or won't wait next generation of ultra-high-resolution ipads better energy efficiency, might want stock on few 37 watt hour battery packs @ $55 apiece won't tied wall socket. these battery packs charge smartphone , other usb device might have well.[
http://www.informationweek.com/byte/news/personal-tech/tablets/232602960
jtmav
different device different. cool. got it. 
Forums iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch iPad iPad
- iPhone
- Mac OS & System Software
- iPad
- Apple Watch
- Notebooks
- iTunes
- Apple ID
- iCloud
- Desktop Computers
- Apple Music
- Professional Applications
- iPod
- iWork
- Apple TV
- iLife
- Wireless
No comments:
Post a Comment