hi guys,
i've had 2 sources of different information machine has speed advantage.
1) http://www.primatelabs.ca/geekbench/mac-benchmarks/
page says 2008 8-core (2.8ghz) faster benchmark speed of 9231 vs. 8273 2009 4-core (2.66ghz)
2) http://www.everymac.com/systems/app...erformance-compared-to-early-2008-models.html
page says "the new [low-end 2.66 ghz] quad-core's score in our overall system performance suite, speedmark 5, 16 percent faster of previous 2.8 ghz eight-core mac pro. 27 percent faster in our photoshop tests, , 20 percent faster @ compressor older system. . . "
need guys provide third (or more) opinion perhaps own real world findings.
running lot of photoshop, final cut studio, , tend run lot of these things simultaneously. i'm planning use adobe premiere , maybe after effects in future.
i'm hoping sell 2.8ghz 8-core same price can buy used 2.66ghz 4-core (which mac pro 4,1 in price range) if it's better of course!
guys think?
speedmark total joke. opinion "suite". love 17" mbp same components 15" scores higher justify it's higher price. macworld apple slaves.
being said in pure raw power 8-core faster. has higher clock , real cores vs. hyperthreaded (maybe not used often) 4-core. newer mac pro's ship faster hd's , faster memory maybe why. or possibly macworld/ apple not "allowing" older mac beat newer one. buy new gen hdd , bump memory. buuut 2009 can flashed , hex put in it. boon go 2009.
Forums Macs Desktops Mac Pro
- iPhone
- Mac OS & System Software
- iPad
- Apple Watch
- Notebooks
- iTunes
- Apple ID
- iCloud
- Desktop Computers
- Apple Music
- Professional Applications
- iPod
- iWork
- Apple TV
- iLife
- Wireless
No comments:
Post a Comment