i started question here in republicans react "slut" comment thread ask in own thread.
so, said...
conservatives , whomever else may concern: problem women's sexuality?
can claim problem don't want financial burden when insinuate or outright call woman "slut" having sex demonstrates distaste runs lot deeper wallet. considering cost of pregnancy staggeringly more expensive covering pregnancy. it's woman having sex seems threaten conservatives among us. why that?
i'll tell think. think some men have problem female independence. (unless it's convenient said types of men.) think some men (covertly or overtly) believe superior women , because many in position abuse power suit own agendas , ideals. how else can explain all-male panel @ contraceptive hearing?
it's frustrating watch social progress being undermined. what, power-hungry rich old men feeling little impotent , need assert dominance on women? put these demanding women in their place? "the old days"?
because when tries reduce woman sum of parts , yet seeks deny access self-managing same aspect of own life, how looks.
why should women shamed , punished biology , behaviour therein when men receive high 5 [effectively] same things? if man not "slut" having sex neither woman. if don't apply moral standards gender-neutrally should examine root of why. might not uncover @ root more reason learn think differently.
edit: please see this post if don't wish read replies
white heterosexual christian male.
comes 4 words. in case female sexuality (empowerment) fell foul of christian , male criteria.
Forums Mac Community Politics, Religion, Social Issues
- iPhone
- Mac OS & System Software
- iPad
- Apple Watch
- Notebooks
- iTunes
- Apple ID
- iCloud
- Desktop Computers
- Apple Music
- Professional Applications
- iPod
- iWork
- Apple TV
- iLife
- Wireless
No comments:
Post a Comment